![mac mini ram upgrade 8gb mac mini ram upgrade 8gb](https://9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2020/04/The-Rewind-Mac-mini-2018-Specs.jpg)
#MAC MINI RAM UPGRADE 8GB SOFTWARE#
Software requirements change and what works today is easily surpassed in future updates. Then again, if the memory is soldered in or no longer upgradeable, buy more than you need and go for the 16GB unit. I've found that Macs get by with about half the memory requirement of Windows PC's. I've been supporting Macs and PC's for decades and I still say that Macs don't require as much memory as PC's. Generally, this advice should be geared more to Windows PC users rather than Mac users. Grandmotherly recipe lookups will be fine with 8GB for a few more years to come, before bloat raises that ceiling as well.ĤGB is problematic unless you're quite careful with your app usage, which most older parents are not, likewise most tweens. We're quickly entering a world where 16GB is the minimum for reasonable performance with breathing room. In a laptop, I'm a little more forgiving. In a desk computer, it's barely passable for the average consumer. I still prefer 16GB when expense isn't exorbitant.
![mac mini ram upgrade 8gb mac mini ram upgrade 8gb](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gQq4hLKv1Cc/maxresdefault.jpg)
That's been my claim since the beginning of this thread, but it's worth reiterating. In light of cost, expected workload, and such, 8GB is passable. I'm a little bit right of center with respect to memory recommendations, your explanatory factors apply.
![mac mini ram upgrade 8gb mac mini ram upgrade 8gb](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81WHwz9zWGL._AC_SS450_.jpg)
That's a better response to my claims than most I've come across. That's probably born of a combination of memory being cheap and experience with annoying limitations.īecause the m1 RAM is extortionately expensive, it may well be reasonable to buy an 8G system. even if the SSD is fast, it takes orders of magnitude more time to access something on SSD than in RAMĪs to comment: he's a bit extreme.The data representation is identical (so data takes the same space).The code density of ARM 64-bit code is close to that for x86-64 code (x86-64 is slightly better).The OS is the same (perhaps with fewer drivers, but that doesn't add up to much).There is *nothing* special about the m1 that reduces memory requirements compared with an Intel Mac. And statements get made that don't make any sense.